August 28, 2010

Why social media gurus should be trampled by elephants

Several weeks ago I wrote that social media is not new. I only partially called out the pony, rainbow and unicorn practitioners though. I’ve been ‘doing the Twitter’ for years now and social media gurus there is what teenage girls once were to Myspace. Worse, these gurus claim to be offering professional services.

If I had my say they would all be trampled by elephants. So, without further ado, here are my top 5 reasons your social media guy needs to be trampled by an elephant. Note: I’m not saying all social guys are bad, stretching it you can call me one. I’ve stated before that social works. What I’m railing against are the people who fit my description below.

Ponies, Rainbows and Unicorns

Ask them what they do. The answer: I engage people, I create relationships, I add a layer of transparency. They may as well talk about ponies, rainbows and unicorns.

Now, my friends, is when we run screaming. I can put glass dividers in an office and add transparency. Engaging people is useless without anchoring it to a brand and a business goal. Ask them specifically what they do and who they target (i.e. I create digital campaigns to demographic x to inform them of product y). Gold star if they can hit 1/2. Sometimes the sun, stars, moon and seas are perfectly aligned and somebody can answer this.

Perhaps one of my favourite past-times at conferences is to talk to these guys, telling them ‘engaging people’ does not count and ask for something more specific. Watch their heads explode, just like here. I see it as public service.

What’s a bottom line?

When talking to the next social media ‘guru’ you meet, ask them what bottom line impact their campaigns had. Note: bottom line is not engaged people, viral buzz or new followers; bottom line is the amount of sales their campaign generated, customer support queries it solved etc.

Don’t let them talk about ponies, rainbows and unicorns here. Maybe they just never did “math” in school so be really basic: You were paid this much by the big nice executive. In turn, you generated him this many dollars so he had this many left over.

Social Media is ‘it’

As I’ve pointed out before, social media is not the everything. It is a component of something bigger. Perhaps it is aligned with your recruitment strategy (run screaming if they had never thought of this). Maybe it is timed with other marketing activities. But when you meet one who honestly believes everything can be solved socially take pity, it is not their fault. Some people are not born as smart as others. You know, the ones who don’t move for the elephant.

I can’t afford a graphics guy

Yep, I thought the Myspacer’s were terrible but I think the gurus have taken the crown. We all put photos on our site but seriously guys, get a professional photo and photoshop it properly. There is no excuse to have white edges on your photos from a poor cut out nor should I feel like you just scanned last night’s DUI photos.

Don’t worry though, social media gurus, I get that these professional services are expensive and you can’t afford them. That’s because you don’t understand business and can’t charge for what you do. I’ve taken the liberty of doing some research, most Universities offer great marketing programs.

Wait, my Apple runs on Unix? or What’s a Unix?

Betting on a social guru with no technology training is like betting on the Mayans. No, they don’t have to be coders, engineers or designers but you need to fundamentally understand your field. Would you hire a plumber who didn’t know water went downhill?

If your guru lacks any technical knowledge it’s time to call the elephants over.

June 27, 2010

A quick and dirty study on Social Media

I’ve noticed lately that my buying behavior has been switching to brands who are on social media and, more importantly, brands who would engage with me (more on that soon). I wanted to see if I was an oddity or a norm here.

So, like anybody else would on a Sunday I created a 30 second survey on Google Docs and Tweeted. This is by no means a comprehensive survey but a quick and dirty fact finding mission. As many of the respondents (around 65%) located the survey on Twitter you can say that the pool is somewhat biased when comparing channels. For those wanting real specifics, n=40 (with two disqualified for incomplete information, not bad for an hour on Sunday afternoon). Read into the results as you wish, my followers helped me collect the data so it is only fair I share it.

70% of respondents indicated that a companies social media account influences their purchase decisions. All users who responded to this survey are clearly social media savvy (and thus the results are only applicable to a similar crowd) but it does demonstrate that people on these channels expect representation from businesses.

60% of all respondents indicated social media as part of their purchase criteria (the difference here being that a company must be on social media to make a purchase) and that they have purchased from a company because they were active on social media where competitors were not. Again, this applies only to a social media crowd but shows that non-savvy small businesses are likely losing sales for not being present.

most influential social media channel

Respondents were then asked to specify the most important social media channel when investigating purchase options / companies. Twitter was considered the most important channel, perhaps due to ease of access and simplicity. Company blogs came in last; my best guess on this one is that company blogs are rarely conversations whereas Facebook Pages and Twitter profiles are often very conversation heavy.

most popular social media marketing channels

Respondents were then asked to rank important factors when evaluating a channel; specifically, when two products / companies maintain social media channels and the user is making decisions. The rate of activity and level of interaction came in at number 1 which, as mentioned earlier, may be why Twitter and Facebook were considered more important than blogs.

Finally, and perhaps most surprisingly, 30% of respondents indicated they regularly pay a higher price for products active on social media over competitors who are not. We already knew social media was an important evaluation tool but this number was somewhat surprising to me.

Read into the facts as you will. As always I love the e-mail, Twitter and comment feedback.

June 1, 2010

Social Media to the Rescue

Word on the Twittersphere is that BP are now running Facebook Ads stating they are ‘committed to stopping the oil leak’. (Note: do you have a screenshot of one? Please do send it in!)

When in crisis companies are turning to Social Media in increasing volumes to the open dialogue it provides (a key point in an earlier article of mine on PR disasters). Toyota handled this well by partnering with Tweetmeme some time ago.

In this case I wonder though: Engaging on a page is one thing. I get the need for damage control but designing and paying for ads right now is probably going to backlash. Spend the money solving (and then cleaning up) the problem. No matter where  BP’s PR guys are there is an audience right now, no need to pay and increase it. There is being upfront and there is self promotion. This is not a time for self promotion.

May 15, 2010

Monitoring Keywords = Sales

Last year I wrote an entry on why Social Media is important for business, specifically how it can be leveraged for sales. I’m not going to rehash what I’ve already said but being a practical guy I love examples; especially recent ones.

A huge part of your social media presence should be monitoring your customers pain points in keywords. Reach out to them. You will  be suprised at how well it works. I’ll be calling my local TPH dealer.

April 23, 2010

Free eBook: Social Media Workout

I have a confession to make. Supposedly I have been co-writing an ebook on all things web with @NatalieSisson. Due to time commitments I was unable to further my work with Natalie (this time). The good news is she has just released a fantastic (and free!!) eBook giving brief, bite sized workouts to improve your effiency and results in the major social media channels.

Want a taste? The Contents are below:

Workout 1: Back to Basics
Workout 2: Get Facebook Fit
Workout 3: Tone up with Twitter
Workout 4: Exercise Control Of Email
Workout 5: Lunging into LinkedIn
Workout 6:  Make Movie Muscle
Workout 7: Website Weightlifting
Workout 8: Build a Better Blog

It’s totally free so what do you have to lose? Click here to be redirected to Natalie’s WomanzWorld and get your copy.

April 17, 2010

The Hacker News Effect

I love traffic spikes, they are exciting. Some time ago I wrote about a ‘how to’ guide of mine, How to add LinkedIN contacts to Twitter, which became popular (see the entry, ‘Why I love Social Media‘). At the time I was excited about getting to number 1 on google while being bookmarked and tweeted. After writing that post traffic continued to grow and the guide has now generated over 5,000 uniques and 260 tweets for this blog. There was certainly a viral period where I was getting huge spikes in my taffic and the article has since been featured and linked by many groups, blogs and consultants.

Traffic from HN

Unique Website Visitors

In the past 24 hours I’ve had another great traffic spike, this time from Hacker News (HN). If you are not aware of HN it is operated by YCombinator, a startup incubator, and features plenty of interesting discussions and user submitted articles. The HN feed is the first I read in my RSS each morning.

It really draws strong traffic too! Last night I submitted my latest entry, Having a price is really cool for getting profits, to the community. Sitting on the ‘New’ page drew decent traffic, about a 15% increase on my normal traffic. After receiving enough upvotes I made it to the main HN feed and received a great traffic spike (and hopefully the article added some value!). I don’t think I need to tell you the percentage, the image speaks for itself.

In all honesty I’ve been a reader and occasional commenter on HN for some time but had never considered putting any of my articles into the feed. Now I’m glad I tried! The moral to this story? If traffic is down you don’t need to do anything drastic, sometimes the answer is right infront of you. Think about the sites / resources you use daily and see if they can be applied to solve your problem.

April 16, 2010

Well played Twitter!

It’s been on the cards for a while. Tweetie has been acquired (and is becoming the official Twitter app). A new URL shortener is being launched. Android apps are being made official. Ads have been launched. Twitter has grown up. They are making the transition from a platform to a product.

Platform:  describes some sort of hardware architecture or software framework (including application frameworks), that allows software to run.
Product: commodities offered for sale

The warning signs have been there for a while. Developers were encouraged to stop filling the holes in Twitters products and instead focus on innovation. It’s a tough situation and a real Catch-22 for Twitter. I feel for the developers but Twitter is a business and at some point there needsto be a focus on profit.

There is no doubt developers helped grow Twitter. Most of us use applications (i.e. Seesmic) and I’d be willing to bet some users joined due to developers promoting their tools. A developer ecosystem was not only encouraged but  heavily promoted so developers felt safe and continued on. Some innovations were marginal and deserve to be crushed, some were fantastic but we all draw the line at different points. What we cannot question is that 3rd party developer’s added value and pushed the Twitter forward.

As a business this ecosystem begins to hurt Twitter. They were a mildly profitable platform but not a wildly profitable product like their contemporaries. While not very innovative ads are worth too much cash to turn down but nobody visited Twitter.com (how often do you visit  to send / read a tweet?). The same ecosystem that pushed the company forward is now taking away the impressions and hit counts that are important to advertisers. As a platform owner Twitter have every right to take control back and this is exactly what they are doing.

It has been made clear that the ecosystem will continue to be encouraged. Skeptics are quick to point out that Twitter might monitor how  3rd party features work before rolling it into the core system. My biggest issue is not Twitter taking back their platform but having encouraged the developers and never making it clear that ‘eventually, we want control’. The other half of me understands the need to grow a revenue model and for that they need their visitors back.

I cannot buy their advice to developers to not fill holes anymore. After all, what is a hole? I’m fairly sure a few years ago shortened links & desktop tweeting were not holes in the Twitter product but innovations. Now developers are encouraged to focus on improving the stream (i.e. propagating streams further across the web, a huge benefit to Twitter).

Well played Twitter! I hope it works out!

October 10, 2009

Cool Campaigns – and how small business can learn

I always love seeing it when people really get it. By any indication Volkswagen & Coca Cola do.

Starting with Volkswagens’ TheFunTheory.com, the marketing message is mundane tasks and habits can be changed by making them fun. Clearly we associate this with Volkswagen being fun; or making the mundane fun. Seems pretty simple and in line with the VW brand so far?

What separates this campaign is execution. No actors. They are performing social experiments and involving people with the Volkswagen brand (see below).


Moving over to Coke Zero and FacialProfiler.com . Simply connect your Facebook account and Coke will analyse your profile photos and find a digital double. It’s kind of cool, takes a few clicks and certainly suckered me in. How does this relate to Coca Cola? Their latest campaign revolves around Coke Zero ‘stealing’ the taste of traditional Coke, a la a double.

Both campaigns have gone viral. Both are providing users with experiences based around brands. Both implicitly have the brand message. Most importantly, both are probably cheaper to produce than a single 30 second slot on a major network!!! I know both companies will still utilize television but, especially in the case of Volkswagen, these videos form ads on their own!

Why is this important for you? Both can easily be scaled for small business. You could replicate the bottomless garbage bin locally for less than $500, cheaper than a ¼ page newspaper advert in most cities (disclosure: I do not condone copying). Grab a handycam and put them on Youtube so those who missed out can take a look. Do you run a cafe across two cities? Why not find cross city look alikes! Local people become involved in your business.

Just one mention makes this cost effective promotion (and typically local media is starved of excitement). It is also something different. People become excited and passionate. You have involved people far more than you would have ever done with a newspaper advert or television commercial for far less money.

August 5, 2009

Explaining Social Media – The Knockout

There is one thing you and I probably have in common. We are always explaining this ‘social media’ stuff and how it can be applied to business. The possibilities are endless really. I’m going to share my K.O. when in heated discussions with luddites and fear mongers. Words can’t explain my point as eloquently as the interactions I’m posting below:

twittertravelocity

I @’ed some questions to Travelocity and received prompt responses. The following day I received a #followfriday from the Travelocity team.

For most of us Twitter is a hybrid; but one application is to put questions to a broader community and request feedback. It may be ‘has anybody had experience with company xyz’ or ‘I need a new mobile carrier – any ideas?’. Why shouldn’t a company be actively searching its industry and own name for potential leads (for 20 dollars a year many services will automate this for you).

So what happened? I was impressed that Travelocity spoke to me in such a public forum. I felt like they cared. I was dealing with a real person. I was impressed that they found me (without me referencing their Twitter directly). Even when it was slightly more expensive I booked nearly everything through Travelocity. They won me over. Twitter is a free service and a tweet takes half a minute. No phone queues or expensive hold systems. 30 seconds alone won Travelocity $4-5,000ish of upfront business and many more long-term bookings from many similar competitors. On top of that I’m suggesting them to most of my friends.

For something so cheap and easy, can your business afford to not be doing that?

Some more good examples (I’ll keep in the field of travel).This is by no means an exclusive list but are the two most prominent that come to mind.

  1. I am following WestJet on Twitter due to having flights booked with them. One tweeter mentioned that he had booked tickets for the family to Los Angeles. Westjet responded over Twitter with a simple ‘good luck and have fun in Disneyland’.
  2. Virgin America are very interesting and really get ‘it’. I’ve all too often seen excited tweets of ‘just booked VA tickets to xxx’. Virgin will usually respond asking for photos which are promptly posted to the Virgin Twitter.

How special and valued do you think these customers feel after these interactions? Using a free service, minimal manpower and no marketing effort customers & potential customers have been pleasantly surprised and engaged by a brand; usually becoming more than just consumers but supporters and mouth-pieces.

June 4, 2009

Why I @ so much

Yesterday I got into a slightly heated discussion with one of my Twitter followers. I was asked to not @ people so much as they were finding that nearly half of my tweets, sometimes mere, were @’s.

Obviously I ignored this piece of advice but it made me think, Why do I @ so much in the first place? First I needed to consider, What is Social Media to me and why do I bother using it?

To me, any social media site is based on transparency and open discussion. Sharing information and dealing with people as individuals is of the greatest importance.  Its why I think many business’s and individuals fail. To give you an example, my local newspaper are on Twitter and all they put in their twitterfeed is automated links to published articles. What good is that? I’ve also found countless retailers who only tweet their specials. Now what good is that?

Social media is about having an identity and as I said, treating people as individuals. There is no value for me to follow the newspaper or these individuals if the same information is sent to me by their newsletters and is promoted on the front page of their website. Social media is about providing unique content, and as far as I am concerned, is a great and cost effective way to open a dialogue with current and future customers. I’d be much more likely to follow the newspaper if they asked for a discussion of the article and opened up a ‘Twitter forum’. Then I am engaged with their brand; any marketer can tell you how important that is.

Some brands get this and try to open up a discussion. Those brands get the first step correct but mess up the second; responding. Surely you can’t begin to engage customers in a discussion and then leave it. This is why I personally respond to as many people as possible with @’s (though I often get 15-20 a day, so there is a backlog and sadly I miss some). It continues the discussion, further engages people with my personal brand, brings the relationship to a deeper, more personal level, encourages the user to engage themselves next time and gives a personal level of gratitude. To me this is just as important, if not more important, than opening the dialogue in the first place. When brands respond to me personally online I’m far more happy.

Brands that don’t even try to engage me in the first place fail. Social media is built to foster this engagement and most of the users join seeking it, so any brand who tackles social media with a standardized message is going nowhere fast. Engaging users on social media can direct some serious traffic; when I am happy I link it and looking at my bit.ly tracker each of my links generate an average of 300 clicks – this is also increasing fast as my follower count increases. Each @ is also another chance to re-promote the same link.

The big dilemma is that I need to remain conscious that my @’s may not be interesting to others so I am (loosely, I often forget) trying to stick to the following @ rules:

  • Try to paraphrase the @, so users not involved in the first leg of the dialogue can understand what is going on.
  • For generic @’s (ie thanks for the RT), I try and cram as many users in the tweet as possible and re post the bit.ly link.
  • Keep the discussion going. Tweeting ‘thanks’ is no good but ‘Thanks for telling me about x, what does everybody else think’ is good.

And there you have it, my justification for so many @’s and what I (try) to do to make it less of a burden on my followers.