August 8, 2010

Social Media is NOT new

Engage. Form Relationships. Share content. Social is the new currency. Social Media is the answer. There has been a fundamental shift in how we communicate.

I’m sick of hearing it. This is not new information. How we communicate now is how great communicators have always worked their trade. Word of Mouth has always been powerful. Social Media may be a new term but the theories and fundamentals are not.

My argument is that excluding the new term, social media is nothing new.

What is Social Media?

There are many definitions of social media. I’m a simple guy who lives by simple definitions. To me, Social Media is people communicating and collaborating online.

We can talk about the change in pace, the openness and transparency but our core reason for joining is communication. I concede that the speed and technologies that underwrite this process are different today. I concede that more people are involved in this channel than there were previously. However, people have always communicated and collaborated online.

A long time ago, in a galaxy far far away

The Internet did not exist. People sent letters to each other. Telephones and telegrams came to prominence. People spoke in small gatherings. They communicated. They made friends. They formed relationships. They engaged. Sound familiar?

Then a friendly, cheerful man invented the Internet. People were using BBS’s to communicate. When I was operating my first companies and even up to 5 years ago I was a member of 40+ forums. At the same time others were making profile pages on Geocities and communicating through guest books, web rings and other old school techniques. I’d always be involved in multiple conversations and threads, building a rapport to promote my services. I engaged users. I shared interesting content with the board. I created original content. I commented on other users content. I built relationships and rapport. Sound familiar?

It should. Old media, gurus and just too many people in between either have short term memories or poor research skills. What is happening today is not new. Back then I knew several firms trying to integrate my forum identities and create a singular stream. It has been a long journey to get where we are today, nothing happened overnight.

Experts: Please give it a rest

I get the need to hype your own field, I do plenty of Digital marketing. But it seems the ‘experts’ and ‘gurus’ are a huge part of this misconception.

  • Even if Social Media was new, why are we still talking about engage / form relationships at most conferences. This is not high level stuff.
  • Many older users are scared by the change in medium and assume it is new. They fail to realize how normal this is for younger and more seasoned users.

If I was born decades ago I’d be still be forming relationships. If I was at a cocktail party there would be people I knew and was incubating relationships with. There would be people I need introductions to. I would talk, listen and engage. People from every background would likely be in attendance. Just as diverse as social media today.

I think half the problem is their fundamental misunderstanding of what has actually changed. Even scarier are the ones who think you can pop out a tweets and have a business. This is why we are still having such low level conversations.

Ask an expert if they have a basic model. Most don’t. Ask them what their suggested listen, respond and produce ratio’s are; they will probably look at you blankly. There is researched little data on Social Media because the smart consultants realize how this slots into a bigger marketing picture and are busy applying it as one tool. Worse, I don’t think the experts understand this.

You are not an expert in communication

And to claim to be a Social Media expert you are almost claiming to be an expert in communications. You probably are not and are specially not a social media expert with no technical background.

All of my clients who have a social marketing module (notice how I dropped the ‘media’?) are told that they need to put their own voices forward. If you want to be social be social, not manufactured social.

Social is hard to quantify. People have tried. SPIN Selling is old but still works. There are very few experts in talking to people. There is a reason. Social is no different. The best social marketers get relationships offline as quick as they can.

We are just transitioning

Much of what used to happen offline is now happening online. This transitioning has  been happening far longer than most know. As the pace of technology innovation quickens we exacerbate this transition.

Just because something has become popular it does not mean it is new. The Internet used to be boutique corner stores and Internet cafes. Now the chain stores are in (Facebook, Twitter). When Wal-Mart opened shopping was not new.

Social Media Works

Social Media does work, but when it is part of something bigger. I’ve authored quite a few articles on the topic and you will see that it is generally about integrating it into something bigger or providing solid insights for those who are at the medium level. That is my target market and who I write for.

My challenge to the other ‘gurus’ out there is to:

  1. Stop talking about obvious things
    1. If your knowledge does not go further, quit while you are ahead
  2. Recognize social media works as part of something bigger
  3. If you want to be social media specific, get to a higher level. Anybody can Google what most of us are blogging.
  • http://twitter.com/somanisoftware Sohail Somani

    New technology usually amplifies what was possible before. I think in this context, ‘social media’ allows social people/organizations to be even more social which may explain why I have 100 followers while you have 30 thousand!/me needs some social lessons.

    • http://www.twitter.com/alexblom AlexBlom

      Thanks Sohail.

      I do tend to agree and conceded earlier that we are amplifying what was able to happen earlier. But I can tell you right now I move relationships offline as quick as possible and the fundamentals (i.e. how to manage people) have not changed in this scenario.

      Follower Counts are not everything :)

  • http://entrepreneurinmaking.com Devesh

    I agree. It’s the medium that has changed but everything else is still the same… You’re talking to the same humans and human emotions/ reactions would be the same to a message regardless of the message being delivered via email or letter.

    I somehow don’t buy the numbers of connections or followers philosophy… I’ve utilized social media to many uses from finding a job to finding business to helping others to connecting others, to research and what not and I have been doing that since I had under 100 contacts, even after more than 5 years of using these platforms like LI and FB actively, I still am not connected to even 1% of the number they cap the friends’ list at… However, I never felt a need of pushing those numbers because I am content and fully occupied with what my existing sociability is returning me… I believe, I stand on the quality of connections side of the road and not quantity…

  • http://twitter.com/mikeziarko Mike Ziarko

    Well said. When all the hype is said and done, out of the ashes these tried and tested methods will be the only things worth talking about. We might be living in the digital age but relationships are as old as time.

  • Jeff Waldman

    Alex… 100% agree with everything you said. People have been socializing, talking, collaborating, building relationships and connecting since humans existed. How we are doing this, and the topics we are focusing on are changing. But the ‘why’ remains the same. To me, social media has created another channel to communicate with others, start new relationships, broadcast ideas and so forth. Alex, I think you nailed it when you said that social media needs to be part of something bigger, and that you start new relationships online, but quickly move offline. Nothimg is more powerful than the face to face interaction between people. Final thought for those self proclaimed social media experts who think using social media can make you millions… HUH??

  • http://twitter.com/somanisoftware Sohail Somani

    New technology amplifies what was possible before. I think in this context, 'social media' allows social people/organizations to be even more social which may explain why I have 100 followers while you have 30 thousand!

    /me needs some social lessons.

  • http://www.twitter.com/alexblom AlexBlom

    Thanks Sohail.

    I do tend to agree and conceded earlier that we are amplifying what was able to happen earlier. But I can tell you right now I move relationships offline as quick as possible and the fundamentals (i.e. how to manage people) have not changed in this scenario.

    Follower Counts are not everything :)

  • http://entrepreneurinmaking.com Devesh

    I agree. It's the medium that has changed but everything else is still the same… You're talking to the same humans and human emotions/ reactions would be the same to a message regardless of the message being delivered via email or letter.

    I somehow don't buy the numbers of connections or followers philosophy… I've utilized social media to many uses from finding a job to finding business to helping others to connecting others, to research and what not and I have been doing that since I had under 100 contacts, even after more than 5 years of using these platforms like LI and FB actively, I still am not connected to even 1% of the number they cap the friends' list at… However, I never felt a need of pushing those numbers because I am content and fully occupied with what my existing sociability is returning me… I believe, I stand on the quality of connections side of the road and not quantity…

  • http://twitter.com/mikeziarko Mike Ziarko

    Well said. When all the hype is said and done, out of the ashes these tried and tested methods will be the only things worth talking about. We might be living in the digital age but relationships are as old as time.

  • http://twitter.com/melaclaro Mel Aclaro

    Alex… it’s very refreshing to hear this from another camp. It’s a welcomed sight to see it from someone other than me repeatedly telling my colleagues, “stop saying ‘paradigm shift’” when they trumpet social media. Thanks for sharing.

  • Jeff Waldman

    Alex… 100% agree with everything you said. People have been socializing, talking, collaborating, building relationships and connecting since humans existed. How we are doing this, and the topics we are focusing on are changing. But the 'why' remains the same. To me, social media has created another channel to communicate with others, start new relationships, broadcast ideas and so forth. Alex, I think you nailed it when you said that social media needs to be part of something bigger, and that you start new relationships online, but quickly move offline. Nothimg is more powerful than the face to face interaction between people. Final thought for those self proclaimed social media experts who think using social media can make you millions… HUH??

  • http://twitter.com/melaclaro Mel Aclaro

    Alex… it's very refreshing to hear this from another camp. It's a welcomed sight to see it from someone other than me repeatedly telling my colleagues, “stop saying 'paradigm shift'” when they trumpet social media. Thanks for sharing.

  • http://www.thewriteway.com Kathy Magrino

    Alex, As usual, you are so on-target with your thinking! Success in any medium is created by effective communication skills.

  • http://www.thewriteway.com Kathy Magrino

    Alex, As usual, you are so on-target with your thinking! Success in any medium is created by effective communication skills.

  • http://twitter.com/TerrorBite TerrorBite

    “And to claim to be a Social Media expert you are almost claiming to be an expert in communications.”

    This is something I’ve been thinking myself lately. I see these people all over Twitter – “Social Media expert/guru/entreupener/etc” – but I cannot for the life of me work out what any of them actually DO. As far as I can tell, most of them just tweet links to blog posts full of buzzwords. Is there money being made? If so, it’ll be from marketing. So “Social media expert” is really a misnomer.

  • http://twitter.com/TerrorBite TerrorBite

    “And to claim to be a Social Media expert you are almost claiming to be an expert in communications.”

    This is something I've been thinking myself lately. I see these people all over Twitter – “Social Media expert/guru/entreupener/etc” – but I cannot for the life of me work out what any of them actually DO. As far as I can tell, most of them just tweet links to blog posts full of buzzwords. Is there money being made? If so, it'll be from marketing. So “Social media expert” is really a misnomer.

  • Pingback: Scheduling tweets: A race to the bottom

  • http://www.converstations.com MikeSansone

    YES! Since “chalk on a rock” we’ve used various forms of media to share ideas with others. Love this line: “When Wal-Mart opened, shopping was NOT new.”

  • http://www.converstations.com MikeSansone

    YES! Since “chalk on a rock” we've used various forms of media to share ideas with others. Love this line: “When Wal-Mart opened, shopping was NOT new.”

  • http://www.twitter.com/alexblom AlexBlom

    AAAA

  • Charles F. Moreira

    Right on again, Alex. I wish I could write what you write in my publication, where articles like yours would be censored to appease the readers who’re all under the misconceptions you mention here.

    Last year, I covered a conference where a speaker said that social media enabled a “revolution” where people consulted each other about products rather than rely on what the advertisers said about it.

    Hello! Didn’t our parents, grandparents, great grandparents, great great grandparents, or 1024 ancestors 10 generations removed (2 to the power of 10) and earlier not also consult their peers about products they wanted to buy?

  • Charles F. Moreira

    Right on again, Alex. I wish I could write what you write in my publication, where articles like yours would be censored to appease the readers who’re all under the misconceptions you mention here.

    Last year, I covered a conference where a speaker said that social media enabled a “revolution” where people consulted each other about products rather than rely on what the advertisers said about it.

    Hello! Didn’t our parents, grandparents, great grandparents, great great grandparents, or 1024 ancestors 10 generations removed (2 to the power of 10) and earlier not also consult their peers about products they wanted to buy?

  • Anonymous

    Indeed I’ve been BBS’ing and social networking since my first Commodore machines, and running communities back then using Fidonet. there is NOTHING new in social media in concept, and often in practice. What has changed is scale. It’s not revolutionary technology, and often there are better tools to get jobs done. Often social media is a set of tools in search of problems to solve. Feel free to come visit and comment on my blog, Giving The Business To Social Media, since I’m always hopeful of building a place for people who think critically about the “common wisdom” on social media.

  • Anonymous

    Indeed I’ve been BBS’ing and social networking since my first Commodore machines, and running communities back then using Fidonet. there is NOTHING new in social media in concept, and often in practice. What has changed is scale. It’s not revolutionary technology, and often there are better tools to get jobs done. Often social media is a set of tools in search of problems to solve. Feel free to come visit and comment on my blog, Giving The Business To Social Media, since I’m always hopeful of building a place for people who think critically about the “common wisdom” on social media.

  • http://busylearners.com Robert Bacal

    Indeed I’ve been BBS’ing and social networking since my first Commodore machines, and running communities back then using Fidonet. there is NOTHING new in social media in concept, and often in practice. What has changed is scale. It’s not revolutionary technology, and often there are better tools to get jobs done. Often social media is a set of tools in search of problems to solve. Feel free to come visit and comment on my blog, Giving The Business To Social Media, since I’m always hopeful of building a place for people who think critically about the “common wisdom” on social media.

  • http://twitter.com/shelholtz Shel Holtz

    I have a different perspective. You’re right that there are many definitions of “social media.” I’ve heard the argument that Usenet (and Fidonet, for that matter) are examples of social media. Nobody called these communication/collaboration channels social media, though. The term emerged with the newer tools, starting with blogs, for a reason. These newer tools were different. They didn’t require someone with a geek pedigree to figure out how to use them. That’s why I like the definitions offered by people like Charlene Li that include ease of use. For me, the benchmark of whether a technology qualifies as social media is whether my 78-year-old mother can use it. Facebook? You bet. IRC? Not so much.

    I don’t mind keeping things simple, but when one simplifies the definition of a category so much and it becomes so broad that it no longer describes something, then the label becomes meaningless. The way I see it, collaboration and communication technologies have been around for decades. Social media as a term came into use much later. Whether you consider something 10 years old to be new is a matter of perspective, but I peg the beginnings of social media with the appearance of the first blogs.

    Wikipedia cites Andreas Kaplan and Michael Haenlein’s definition, “a group of Internet-based applications that build on the ideological and technological foundations of Web 2.0.” To accept the link between social media and Web 2.0 is to acknowledge that social media doesn’t date back to pre-Web technologies designed for VT-100 emulation.

    Also, the ease-of-use factor has led to the popularization of social networking, expanding the community from early adopters and hardcore geeks to the general population, not unlike the sudden onslaught of AOLers onto the Net. It’s that critical mass that distinguishes social media from earlier collaboration/communication tools.

    • Lisa Low

      I love how a so-called expert disses his own profession. Really? Hope that works out well for you.

  • http://twitter.com/shelholtz Shel Holtz

    I have a different perspective. You’re right that there are many definitions of “social media.” I’ve heard the argument that Usenet (and Fidonet, for that matter) are examples of social media. Nobody called these communication/collaboration channels social media, though. The term emerged with the newer tools, starting with blogs, for a reason. These newer tools were different. They didn’t require someone with a geek pedigree to figure out how to use them. That’s why I like the definitions offered by people like Charlene Li that include ease of use. For me, the benchmark of whether a technology qualifies as social media is whether my 78-year-old mother can use it. Facebook? You bet. IRC? Not so much.

    I don’t mind keeping things simple, but when one simplifies the definition of a category so much and it becomes so broad that it no longer describes something, then the label becomes meaningless. The way I see it, collaboration and communication technologies have been around for decades. Social media as a term came into use much later. Whether you consider something 10 years old to be new is a matter of perspective, but I peg the beginnings of social media with the appearance of the first blogs.

    Wikipedia cites Andreas Kaplan and Michael Haenlein’s definition, “a group of Internet-based applications that build on the ideological and technological foundations of Web 2.0.” To accept the link between social media and Web 2.0 is to acknowledge that social media doesn’t date back to pre-Web technologies designed for VT-100 emulation.

    Also, the ease-of-use factor has led to the popularization of social networking, expanding the community from early adopters and hardcore geeks to the general population, not unlike the sudden onslaught of AOLers onto the Net. It’s that critical mass that distinguishes social media from earlier collaboration/communication tools.

  • Lisa Low

    I love how a so-called expert disses his own profession. Really? Hope that works out well for you.

    • http://www.twitter.com/alexblom AlexBlom

      Lisa,
      Not only do I not claim to be an expert but I repeatedly state that social media can be beneficial. My argument is clear in challenging certain paradigms of the field, a sign of any healthy industry.
      Questioning is not dissing, nor is it necessarily negative to the field in general.

  • http://www.twitter.com/alexblom AlexBlom

    Lisa,
    Not only do I not claim to be an expert but I repeatedly state that social media can be beneficial. My argument is clear in challenging certain paradigms of the field, a sign of any healthy industry.
    Questioning is not dissing, nor is it necessarily negative to the field in general.

  • Pingback: Why social media gurus should be trampled by elephants

  • http://twitter.com/imamike Michael Mahoney

    I often tell business owners who don’t understand Social Media that there is nothing new to understand.

    I ask them to distill it down to something they do get, take retail. They ask “What do I do if someone comments negatively on my facebook wall?” I answer “What do you do if someone comes into your retail store and makes a big noise at the checkout about your sky high prices? you would know what to do, its the same situation online” I go through an exercise to break down every social media interaction into a similar real world example in their existing business. After this it never seems new or revolutionary and they can easily stand on their own two feed using good judgement. No need for expensive consultants and experts to tell them how to talk to customers all over again.

    The tools may change like you say, but people’s intrinsic needs are the same today as they were 1000 years ago. This means successful tools rarely solve any new problems, they solve the same old problems slightly faster, slightly better.

  • http://twitter.com/imamike Michael Mahoney

    I often tell business owners who don’t understand Social Media that there is nothing new to understand.

    I ask them to distill it down to something they do get, take retail. They ask “What do I do if someone comments negatively on my facebook wall?” I answer “What do you do if someone comes into your retail store and makes a big noise at the checkout about your sky high prices? you would know what to do, its the same situation online” I go through an exercise to break down every social media interaction into a similar real world example in their existing business. After this it never seems new or revolutionary and they can easily stand on their own two feed using good judgement. No need for expensive consultants and experts to tell them how to talk to customers all over again.

    The tools may change like you say, but people’s intrinsic needs are the same today as they were 1000 years ago. This means successful tools rarely solve any new problems, they solve the same old problems slightly faster, slightly better.

  • http://foreverbodytransformationreview.blogspot.com Arrimetwirway

    Nice read. I just passed this onto a friend who was doing some research on that. He just bought me lunch since I found it for him! Therefore let me rephrase: Thank you for lunch!

  • Pingback: Why social media gurus should be trampled by elephants «

  • http://dennisssblegh.com dennis

    http://dennisssblegh.com|dennis

    hey
    Lovely site